Why Excel is Unsuitable for Driving Execution

One critical ingredient of execution is action. The actions people take to learn why performance isn’t hitting targets. The actions people need to take to get performance back on track. Even the mundane actions people take to collect and report data and explain performance in one place. All of these actions are critical to improving rather than reporting results. And it is here that Excel begins to fall down.

Excel isn’t going to actively move people along to complete actions. For example:

• Excel won’t email a person and/or the boss when he/she needs to explain why a measure didn’t hit its target.
• Excel won’t capture the complete history of a portfolio of initiatives/strategic projects as they relate to the performance of a measure.
• Excel doesn't make it easy to capture action items during performance reviews or offer reminders and easy ways to follow up to make sure those action items get done.
• Excel doesn’t understand the organization’s reporting hierarchy, so it won’t provide managers with a simple view of what their teams are working on.

These are just a few examples -- some of which might be beyond what you're currently thinking about doing in a spreadsheet-based Scorecard or performance management framework. But support for these and other actions is critical if you really want to drive results.

Maybe a very smart Excel administrator could overcome some of these problems. But, with increasing speed and interconnectedness of global organizations, Excel's inability to drive action is only the tip of the iceberg, called poor execution.

Mg uses the familiar spreadsheet metaphor and transforms it into a comprehensive overview of the execution workflow.